Code
Completion, review, migration and agentic development tools.

ClaudeAnthropic
Anthropic's AI chatbot and coding assistant
From $20/mo

GitHub CopilotGitHub
AI pair programmer built into your IDE
From $10/mo

CursorAnysphere
AI-native code editor built on VS Code
From $20/mo

ReplitReplit
Browser-based coding environment with an AI build agent
From $20/mo

TabnineTabnine
Privacy-focused AI code completion for enterprise teams
From $39/mo

Agentic AI code editor forked from VS Code
From $20/mo

Sourcegraph CodySourcegraph
Enterprise AI coding assistant with repo-wide context
Contact for pricing

Open-source workflow automation with a code escape hatch
Freemium
Questions about code tools
Cursor, Windsurf or GitHub Copilot?
Copilot if procurement has to approve it, and for pull request review. Cursor and Windsurf are ahead on the editing loop and close to each other — Cursor’s completion and agent are the more polished pair, Windsurf runs longer autonomous tasks and does not wall its free-tier autocomplete. A fortnight in each settles it faster than any comparison.
What changes when the codebase is large?
Retrieval matters more than the model. Sourcegraph Cody indexes across every repository rather than the open project, which is the difference between answering “where is this used” across a monorepo and guessing at it. Assistants that only see open files degrade quickly past a few hundred thousand lines.
What if code cannot leave our network?
Tabnine and Sourcegraph Cody are the two here with genuine self-hosted and air-gapped deployments, and Tabnine adds IP indemnification for what it generates. Everything else in this category sends context to a third-party API, however good the contract around it is.