Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf
Both are built for Code — here's how Sourcegraph Cody and Windsurf actually differ on pricing, platform reach and where each one is strongest.
At a glance
| Attribute | Sourcegraph Cody | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | From $20/mo |
| Platforms | Web, Self-hosted, macOS, Windows | macOS, Windows |
| Categories | Code | Code |
| Integrations | Not listed | Not listed |
Where each stands
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- Context quality benefits directly from Sourcegraph's mature code search and indexing
- Strong option for very large, sprawling codebases where single-file context tools struggle
- Robust self-hosted and air-gapped deployment for regulated industries
Cons
- No longer available to individuals or small teams — free and Pro plans were discontinued in mid-2025
- Enterprise contracts start high, putting it out of reach for most teams under a few hundred seats
- Agentic, multi-file editing capability trails newer agent-first tools like Cursor or Copilot's agent mode
Windsurf
Pros
- Unlimited autocomplete on every plan, including free, is generous compared to competitors
- Familiar VS Code layout makes switching low-friction
- Background cloud agent sessions free up the local machine for other work
Cons
- The product was acquired by Cognition AI and began rebranding to Devin Desktop in 2026, creating real uncertainty about its future direction and name
- Pricing and plan structure changed more than once within the same year, making it hard to budget against
- Premium quotas for agentic and chat work are daily/weekly rather than a simple monthly credit pool, and can run out fast on demanding tasks
Which should you choose?
Sourcegraph Cody is the better fit for:
- Large organizations with monorepos where context across the whole codebase matters
- Regulated enterprises that need self-hosted or air-gapped AI coding tools
- Teams already using Sourcegraph code search who want AI chat layered on top
- Answering where is this used across hundreds of repositories
- Standardising common AI prompts across an engineering organisation
- Assessing the blast radius of a change before making it
Windsurf is the better fit for:
- Migrating from VS Code or Cursor without relearning an editor
- Running longer agentic coding tasks in the background while working elsewhere
- Getting free-tier autocomplete without hitting a usage wall
- Keeping project conventions in memory so the agent stops relearning them
- Wiring the editor to internal tools and data through MCP
- Picking up an agent task the next morning where the last session left it
Looking for more options? Browse every tool in the Code category.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving Sourcegraph Cody or Windsurf.


