Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf

Both are built for Code — here's how Sourcegraph Cody and Windsurf actually differ on pricing, platform reach and where each one is strongest.

At a glance

AttributeSourcegraph CodyWindsurf
PricingContact for pricingFrom $20/mo
PlatformsWeb, Self-hosted, macOS, WindowsmacOS, Windows
CategoriesCodeCode
IntegrationsNot listedNot listed

Where each stands

Sourcegraph Cody

Pros

  • Context quality benefits directly from Sourcegraph's mature code search and indexing
  • Strong option for very large, sprawling codebases where single-file context tools struggle
  • Robust self-hosted and air-gapped deployment for regulated industries

Cons

  • No longer available to individuals or small teams — free and Pro plans were discontinued in mid-2025
  • Enterprise contracts start high, putting it out of reach for most teams under a few hundred seats
  • Agentic, multi-file editing capability trails newer agent-first tools like Cursor or Copilot's agent mode

Windsurf

Pros

  • Unlimited autocomplete on every plan, including free, is generous compared to competitors
  • Familiar VS Code layout makes switching low-friction
  • Background cloud agent sessions free up the local machine for other work

Cons

  • The product was acquired by Cognition AI and began rebranding to Devin Desktop in 2026, creating real uncertainty about its future direction and name
  • Pricing and plan structure changed more than once within the same year, making it hard to budget against
  • Premium quotas for agentic and chat work are daily/weekly rather than a simple monthly credit pool, and can run out fast on demanding tasks

Which should you choose?

Sourcegraph Cody is the better fit for:

  • Large organizations with monorepos where context across the whole codebase matters
  • Regulated enterprises that need self-hosted or air-gapped AI coding tools
  • Teams already using Sourcegraph code search who want AI chat layered on top
  • Answering where is this used across hundreds of repositories
  • Standardising common AI prompts across an engineering organisation
  • Assessing the blast radius of a change before making it

Windsurf is the better fit for:

  • Migrating from VS Code or Cursor without relearning an editor
  • Running longer agentic coding tasks in the background while working elsewhere
  • Getting free-tier autocomplete without hitting a usage wall
  • Keeping project conventions in memory so the agent stops relearning them
  • Wiring the editor to internal tools and data through MCP
  • Picking up an agent task the next morning where the last session left it

Looking for more options? Browse every tool in the Code category.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads involving Sourcegraph Cody or Windsurf.