n8n vs Sourcegraph Cody
Both are built for Code — here's how n8n and Sourcegraph Cody actually differ on pricing, platform reach and where each one is strongest.
At a glance
| Attribute |  n8n |  Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Contact for pricing |
| Platforms | Web, API, Self-hosted | Web, Self-hosted, macOS, Windows |
| Categories | Automation & Agents, Code | Code |
| Integrations | Not listed | Not listed |
Where each stands
n8n
Pros
- The free self-hosted Community Edition has no execution caps and includes most integrations
- Mixing visual nodes with real code covers cases pure no-code tools can't reach
- Open source, so nothing about the workflow is locked into a vendor's cloud
Cons
- Self-hosting means owning the uptime, updates and security of the instance yourself
- The node-based canvas has a steeper learning curve than Zapier's linear Zaps
- Enterprise features like SSO and advanced RBAC are pricey relative to the free tier's generosity
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- Context quality benefits directly from Sourcegraph's mature code search and indexing
- Strong option for very large, sprawling codebases where single-file context tools struggle
- Robust self-hosted and air-gapped deployment for regulated industries
Cons
- No longer available to individuals or small teams — free and Pro plans were discontinued in mid-2025
- Enterprise contracts start high, putting it out of reach for most teams under a few hundred seats
- Agentic, multi-file editing capability trails newer agent-first tools like Cursor or Copilot's agent mode
Which should you choose?
n8n is the better fit for:
- Self-hosting an automation platform to keep sensitive data off a third-party cloud
- Writing a custom JavaScript step where a pre-built integration doesn't exist
- Building an AI agent workflow that also needs to touch conventional business apps
- Running high-volume workflows on your own infrastructure without per-task pricing
- Reusing one workflow as a step inside several others
- Moving an automation off a per-task SaaS bill once the volume stops making sense
Sourcegraph Cody is the better fit for:
- Large organizations with monorepos where context across the whole codebase matters
- Regulated enterprises that need self-hosted or air-gapped AI coding tools
- Teams already using Sourcegraph code search who want AI chat layered on top
- Answering where is this used across hundreds of repositories
- Standardising common AI prompts across an engineering organisation
- Assessing the blast radius of a change before making it
Looking for more options? Browse every tool in the Code category.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving n8n or Sourcegraph Cody.
