Elicit

An AI research assistant for literature reviews

A research assistant that searches over a hundred million academic papers, summarizes and extracts data from them, and automates parts of a systematic literature review with citation-backed answers.

Screenshot of the Elicit homepage

Picked for Literature Review & Evidence Kit.

Elicit was built for the specific pain of a literature review: finding the relevant papers, reading enough of each to know if it qualifies, and pulling comparable data points out of studies that don’t report them in a consistent format. It searches its academic database, ranks results against a research question, and can extract structured data from a batch of papers into one table.

It suits academic researchers, grad students and anyone running a systematic review under time pressure, where the screening and extraction stages are usually the most tedious part of the process. The citation-backed answers matter here more than in a general-purpose chatbot — every extracted value points back to the sentence it came from, which is what makes the output usable in something as rigorous as a published review.

It’s not a substitute for reading, though. The underlying search only covers what’s indexed in its databases, so niche or very recent work can be missing entirely, and the extraction step — being LLM-driven — occasionally misreads a table or pulls the wrong number from a paper with several similar figures. Treat it as a way to move faster through the mechanical parts of a review, with a human still checking the parts that matter.

Features

Paper search

Full-text search across well over a hundred million academic papers and hundreds of thousands of clinical trials.

Data extraction tables

Pulls structured data from hundreds of papers at once into a table, with each cell backed by a supporting quote.

Systematic review support

Auto-generates screening criteria from a research question and ranks papers by likelihood of meeting them.

Chat with papers

Ask questions of a specific paper's full text and get a cited answer instead of a page reference to search manually.

Custom extraction columns

Define the field you need pulled from every paper, so a comparison table answers your question rather than a generic one.

Concept-based search

Matches on what a paper is about rather than on the words it happens to use, which is what surfaces the study filed under different terminology.

Use cases

  • Scoping the existing literature on a research question before writing
  • Screening hundreds of papers against inclusion criteria for a systematic review
  • Extracting a comparable data point, such as sample size or outcome, across many studies at once
  • Building a comparison table of methods and outcomes across a set of studies
  • Finding relevant papers that use none of your search terms
  • Checking whether a research question has already been answered before proposing it

Compare Elicit head to head

Side-by-side comparisons, on pricing, platforms and where each one wins.

Looking for something similar?

Other research tools worth comparing against Elicit.