Context.dev vs Gumloop

Context.dev

Pros

• Every credit comes from one pool, so scraping, search, brand and extraction don't need four subscriptions to reason about
• The free tier is usable rather than decorative — 500 credits, 50 brand retrievals and no card
• Overage rates fall as the plan grows, from $15 to $7 per 10K credits
• Make, Zapier, Sheets and Excel integrations put it in reach of people who won't be writing a client

Cons

• Credit-metered across six different products, so forecasting a month's spend takes more arithmetic than a flat seat price
• The free plan simply stops at 500 credits rather than degrading, which is honest but abrupt mid-build
• SSO, custom limits and the 99.9% SLA are Enterprise-only

Gumloop

Pros

• Built specifically for AI and data workflows rather than legacy REST APIs
• Web scraping nodes handle complex authentication and JavaScript rendering
• Batch processing mode handles huge datasets with progress tracking

Cons

• Steeper conceptual learning curve than basic Zapier trigger-action setups
• Credit-based pricing can scale up quickly on high-volume web scraping tasks
• Requires understanding of data structures for optimal node piping

Context.dev is the better fit for:

• Feeding an agent clean page text without maintaining a scraping fleet
• Building a RAG index from a documentation site in one crawl
• Pulling logos and brand colours for a directory, CRM or partner page
• Enriching a lead list with industry codes from nothing but a domain
• Watching competitor pricing pages and reacting when they change
• Replacing a stack of single-purpose API subscriptions with one credit pool

Gumloop is the better fit for:

• Scraping competitor pricing, product catalogs, and directory data at scale
• Automating outbound lead list research, enrichment, and personalized email drafting
• Processing thousands of customer survey responses and categorization tags in bulk
• Building internal AI-powered data pipelines triggered via webhooks